MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7019963439

The institutional accomodation of an enlarged Europe

2004· other· en· W7019963439 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · 2004
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Education and Practice Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsEconomic integrationEuropean unionCustoms unionDeep integrationDemocracyResizingTrade barrierRegional integration
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

'This paper examines the impact that the process of enlargement may have on European Union institutions in the light of both current democratic theory and the literature on the political economy of trade. The paper assumes that any set of countries will only establish a continent-wide economic and political union if they all benefit in net terms from jointly pooling together their economic assets and political authority. On the one hand, the gross benefits of integration increase with trade and peace gains. On the other hand, integration comes at the cost of losing political sovereign. With complete political integration, the most populous countries can establish regulatory mechanisms on the smaller nations. Thus, the more divergent the standards of living and the distribution of interests and preferences across countries, the more burdensome a political union will be for would-be minority territories and integration will be harder to achieve. If the costs of taxation and regulation exceed trade and peace gains to the point of deterring one or more countries from joining a union, a partial solution to achieve some form of integration would consist in limiting the extent to which all countries pool their assets and authority together. More generally, holding trade and peace gains constant, the depth of political integration would be correlated with the homogeneity in income and interests of the potential members of the union. These insights can be applied to the evolution of the EU. Employing recent data on income distribution, the paper shows, in the first place, that the relatively low level of inter-state inequality in Western Europe explains why this is the only region at the world level where there has been a sustained process of political integration in the last four decades. The paper investigates, in the second place, how this relatively homogeneous distribution of income may change as the EU expands. The paper estimates that the level of inequality has increased from low levels (a Gini index of 32 percent for EU-9 and 34 percent for EU-15, similar to Canada and Australia respectively) to much higher levels (a Gini of 38 percent for EU-25, close to the United States' Gini index). If the EU proceeded to include the Western Balkans and Turkey, the Gini would shoot upwards to about 43 percent. Based on these results, the paper concludes that, unless the trade and security gains of any new enlargement are very substantial, the EU will not achieve any tighter institutional integration and, in fact, may have to accept more decentralization in the future. The paper ends by exploring possible strategies to reduce income heterogeneity and increase political integration in the medium run.' (author's abstract)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.823
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.005
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)Same topicLegal Education and Practice InnovationsFrench-language works237,207