MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7019974960

Insulin-induced Suppression of A-type GABA Receptor Signaling in the INS-1 Pancreatic β-cell Line

2010· dissertation· en· W7019974960 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSecretionAutocrine signallingInsulinReceptorGABAA receptorSignal transductiongamma-Aminobutyric acidAntagonist
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

GABA and GABA type A receptor (GABAAR) are expressed in pancreatic β-cells and comprise an autocrine signaling system. How the GABA-GABAAR system is regulated is unknown. In this study, I investigated insulin’s effect on this system in the INS-1 β-cell line. I found that GABA evoked current (IGABA) in INS-1 cells, resulting in membrane depolarization. Perforated-patch recordings showed that pre-treatment of insulin or zinc-free insulin suppressed IGABA in INS-1 cells (p < 0.01). Radioimmunossay showed that GABA (30 μM) increased C-peptide secretion from INS-1 cells, which was blocked by GABAAR antagonist picrotoxin, indicating that GABA increased insulin secretion through activation of GABAAR. However, insulin significantly reduced the stimulatory effect of GABA on C-peptide secretion (p < 0.05). These data suggest that GABA released from β-cells positively regulates insulin secretion via GABAAR activation, and that insulin negatively regulates the β-cell secretory pathway likely via inhibiting the GABA-GABAAR system in β-cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)→Same topicPancreatic function and diabetes→French-language works237,207→