The integration of permaculture into a land use plan for the City of Guelph, ON
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the wake of 'peak oil' and energy descent, communities will go through a transition towards a more local food production system. Permaculture represents an ethical design method for food production and land use. This research will develop, and then communicate through design, the creation of a permaculture land use plan for the City of Guelph, ON. Data were collected through a focused literature review, exploring the principles of permaculture, focusing on a set of five Permaculture Districts. Site analysis was conducted through GIS mapping, aerial photographs and the land use map for the City of Guelph. Through knowledge gained from the focused literature review and analysis of the land use map for the City of Guelph, a set of criteria was developed for each Permaculture District. The criteria were used to determine the suitability of each Permaculture District within the Official Plan's land use designation for the City of Guelph. The study will serve as a framework to inform the integration of permaculture land uses into a sustainable food system plan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".