MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7020036948

Inuvik Ground Station: Experience from the operations of Sentinel-5P

2021· other· en· W7020036948 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venueelib (German Aerospace Center) · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelecommunications linkTelemetrySatelliteCommunications satelliteBroadbandGround stationSpacecraftWork (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Inuvik Satellite Station Facility (ISSF) located in the Canadian Arctic Circle hosts satellite ground stations owned by the Canadian Government, DLR, SSC, and CNES. The geographic location of ISSF makes these antennas ideal for tracking polar orbiting spacecraft. The Sentinel-5P mission was the first spacecraft controlled from ESA’s European Space Operations Centre to utilize antennas located in Inuvik to support operations. This paper will present operational experience using ISSF antennas to support Sentinel-5P including S-Band TT&C services during LEOP and S/X-Band downlink telemetry services during commissioning and routine operations. An overview of the Sentinel-5P mission will be included along with a description of the ground network used to support the mission during each phase of operations. Details of the Inuvik station will be provided including technical specifications, communications architecture, types of service, and how Inuvik complements the overall ground network. Operational experience and statistics will be included. The future outlook for ISSF will be examined including additional missions, expansion opportunities, and planned upgrades.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.883
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueelib (German Aerospace Center)French-language works237,207