La Carta Social Europea (Revisada): Entre el desconocimiento y su revitalizaci?n como instrumento de coordinaci?n de las pol?ticas sociales europeas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El sistema de la Carta Social Europea oscila, por una parte, entre el \ndesconocimiento que de ?l tienen no s?lo la opini?n p?blica sino los actores pol?ticos y \njur?dicos europeos y, por otra, por su potencialidad jur?dica en la coordinaci?n de las \npol?ticas sociales europeas reivindicada por las distintas instituciones del Consejo de \nEuropa. Para este ?ltimo prop?sito, el sistema de la Carta Social Europea deber?a \nadquirir un mayor protagonismo en los sistemas constitucionales de los Estados as? \ncomo en el acervo comunitario de la UE. A tal efecto resultan de inter?s ciertos \npronunciamientos del TJCE (Laval e Impact) as? como las posibilidades jur?dicas de la \ndimensi?n social de la Carta de Derechos Fundamentales de la Uni?n Europea y sus \nExplicaciones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".