MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7020099410

Journal of South Carolina Water Resources Volume 1, Issue 1

2014· article· en· W7020099410 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTigerPrints (Clemson University) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality and Resources Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOffice for Coastal ManagementSouth Carolina Water Resources Center, Clemson UniversityNational Institute of Food and AgricultureGeorgia Sea Grant, University of GeorgiaU.S. Geological SurveyNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationYork UniversitySouth Carolina Department of Natural ResourcesCollege of CharlestonClemson UniversityYale UniversityU.S. Environmental Protection AgencySouth Carolina Sea Grant ConsortiumNemours Wildlife FoundationUniversity of South CarolinaOffice of Research and DevelopmentNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsSummitSouth carolinaWater resourcesEconomic shortageStormResource (disambiguation)State (computer science)Winter storm
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the better part of 2017, South Carolina saw an improvement in drought status for many of the state’s 55 counties, with the SC Drought Response Committee reporting 28 of those in ‘incipient’ (first stage of drought) status and the remaining 17 in ‘normal’ status on November 27. With regard to major rain events, Tropical Storm Irma brought noteworthy levels of rainfall to much of the state in mid-September, as well as coastal flooding. Because of the ongoing significant weather events that continue to threaten water resources and related infrastructure, Clemson’s SC Water Resources Center held its first Summit Series event entitled “Back to the Future of Drought” in April to begin bringing statewide water professionals together for issue specific forums during the ‘off ’ years of the biennial SC Water Resources Conference (SCWRC). The presentations and discussions during the summit fostered new collaborations and shortly after, the SC State Climatology Office took the lead in coordinating a Drought and Water Shortage Tabletop Exercise in September at the SC Emergency Operations Center, drawing 80 participants from across the state. Included in this issue of the journal is a short communication paper about the exercise. Continuing to build on the benefits of statewide networking and collaboration, the SC State Climatology Office has also developed a 2017-18 Climate Connection Workshop series in collaboration with the Carolinas Integrated Sciences and Assessments (CISA) and the Clemson SC Water Resources Center. The first workshop was held in Greenville in December, and workshops are to be scheduled in Columbia and Charleston in early 2018. In addition, SCDNR in partnership with SCDHEC, USGS, Clemson SC Water Resources Center and USACE, held stakeholder meetings during the fall focused on the state’s groundwater assessment. Events such as these, are filling the growing need to initiate collaborative efforts to positively impact water resources management, which in turn continue to grow the network of outreach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it