La recepción de la datio in solutum en las codificaciones europeas y latinoamericanas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esta investigación pretende aclarar las relaciones históricas existentes entre la tradición europea occidental y el subsistema latinoamericano con respecto a la regulación de la datio in solutum. El análisis se centra especialmente en aquellos códigos en los cuales dicha figura jurídica ha sido expresamente regulada. Debido a la importancia de la datio in solutum necessaria en los ordenamientos latinoamericanos y en el desarrollo del deber de cumplimiento -principio aliud pro alio invito creditore solvi non potest-, este estudio comprende no sólo la datio in solutum voluntaria, sino también el nombrado beneficium. Para el efecto se analizan las fuentes romanas y medievales pertinentes, así como la recepción de la datio in solutum en las codificaciones europeas y latinoamericanas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".