MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7020326234

La diplomacia cultural de Canadá: la construcción de una imagen

2008· article· es· W7020326234 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRibei Digital Library (University of Southampton) · 2008
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Systems and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiplomacyMinistry of Foreign AffairsCultural identityForeign policyContext (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este ARI trata sobre algunas de las acciones desarrolladas por Canadá para promover su cultura al exterior.
\n
\nCanadá es uno de los países en donde el multiculturalismo, el pluralismo, el bilingüismo y la diversidad cultural son característicos; por ello, no se puede hablar de valores y de una cultura canadiense unitaria. La dinámica del federalismo canadiense y la especificidad cultural de Quebec son algunos de los elementos que definen la singularidad de la diplomacia cultural de Canadá. La cultura y la educación son ámbitos de competencia provincial y por tal motivo no existe un Ministerio de Educación o de Cultura a nivel federal, si bien existe el Ministerio de Patrimonio Canadiense (Department of Canadian Heritage) que se ocupa de temas de cultura y patrimonio. Por su parte, el Ministerio de Asuntos Extranjeros y Comercio Internacional (DFAIT por sus siglas en inglés), es el actor principal encargado de los programas culturales internacionales y de la promoción de la comunidad artística y cultural en el exterior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it