MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7020370232

La persistencia de las fronteras culturales. El individualismo en América del norte.

2013· article· es· W7020370232 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRedalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicNationalism and Cultural Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)CitizenshipField (mathematics)Public policy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Se demuestra que en América del Norte hay, con respecto al individualismo, tres divisiones. En la primera, al nivel de los países hay dos grupos: Canadá y Estados Unidos como los más individualistas, y México como el que lo es menos. En la segunda, al nivel de las culturas nacionales, existen tres grupos, ordenados según un individualismo creciente de la siguiente manera: México, Quebec y, conjuntamente, Anglocanadá y Estados Unidos. En la tercera división, al nivel de culturas mundiales, hay dos grupos: los anglosajones (canadienses, angloparlantes y estadounidenses) y los latinos (mexicanos y quebequenses). La base de datos analizada es la submuestra para América del Norte de la Encuesta Mundial de Valores 1982-1983. La demostración se realiza integrando la lógica binaria, el cálculo de combinaciones, el análisis tabular y la regresión logística múltiple.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.490
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it