MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7020384177

Land claims and preservation of sacred sites : the role of the native people's ethnic identity

2001· other· fr· W7020384177 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · 2001
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentity (music)Ethnic groupCapital (architecture)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La notion d'ethnicité va jouer un rôle capital dans les questions contemporaines faisant intervenir des minorités, notamment s'il s'agit d'autochtones. A la base de toutes démarches visant au droit de ces peuples à être reconnus en tant que tels, on trouvera deux éléments centraux entrant en interaction, et se justifiant l'un l'autre : la réaffirmation des croyances et traditions ; et les revendications territoriales comprenant la préservation des sites sacrés. Par une étude comparative portant sur le Canada, les Etats-Unis et l'Australie, on pourra situer la notion d'ethnicité entre les 2 pôles que sont : "le réveil de la mémoire" et "la manipulation idéologique" ; développer les thèmes de "l'art autochtone", du "mythe" et du "sacré" ; replacer la problématique autochtone dans le contexte de la législation internationale et nationale permet de concevoir de manière théorique le rôle de l'identité ethnique au sein de tout processus revendicatif autochtone...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.020
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)→Same topicCultural Heritage Management and Preservation→French-language works237,207→