Le charançon de la racine du fraisier : les bases d'une stratégie de lutte dans les fraisières du Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En 2001 et 2002, nous avons échantillonné 89 fraisières, réparties dans neuf régions agricoles du Québec, afin de connaître la diversité et l’abondance des différentes espèces de charançons des racines. Le sol des différentes fraisières a également été caractérisé. L’écologie saisonnière d’Otiorhynchus ovatus (L.) a été étudiée dans la grande région de Québec. Le charançon des racines le plus abondant dans les fraisières est, sans contredit, O. ovatus avec plus de 82% des captures. Aussi, il a été établi qu’il existe une corrélation entre l’abondance d’O. ovatus et le pourcentage de sable contenu dans un sol. Deux cohortes d’insectes se succèdent au champ et le pic d’abondance se situe à la fin de la période de récolte des fruits. Cette période est la plus propice pour contrôler les populations de O. ovatus avant que les femelles initient la ponte.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".