Le caractère communicationnel de l'homélie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce mémoire a pour point de départ la crise homilétique. En fait, depuis sa réintégration au sein de la liturgie par le Concile, l’homélie n’a pas vraiment su insuffler un vent de renouveau à la prédication liturgique. Ainsi, les plaintes à son sujet augmentent parce qu’elle ne sait pas répondre aux besoins actuels des gens et parce qu’elfe apparaît davantage comme un fardeau pour les homélistes. Sans compter qu’une certaine imprécision demeure lorsqu’il s’agit de la distinguer des autres prédications. Par ailleurs, le monde des communications progresse et dispose maintenant d’éléments capables d’aider à la compréhension du fonctionnement de la communication publique. Comme l’homélie est elle-même une communication publique, ce mémoire cherchera à vérifier en quoi elle peut tirer profit de ces connaissances pour résoudre la crise dont elle est victime.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.060 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".