A leitura dos enunciados dos problemas matemáticos e as estratégias para a resolução por alunos do 9º ano do ensino fundamental
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this dissertation was to understand how to read the statements of mathematics problems occur, with a view to its resolution, by 9th grade students of elementary school. The school investigated is in the town of Garça/SP and was selected from the results of the Evaluation of Educational Achievement System (SARESP) 2012, by the best performance for the subjects tested, and the class, due to better school performance in the 1st quarter of 2013. The research was based on ethnographic type questionnaire, observation, interviews and document analysis, recorded in field notes and audio recordings. It is expected that this work will contribute to a better understanding of the relationships established between the student to read the statement of mathematical problem, and in consequence of it, the possibilities for settlement, and that it can furthermore cause reflections on pedagogical practice, so that the teaching of mathematics is meaningful to the student, he then appropriates the scientific concepts and become the subject of social transformation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".