Le ricerche dell'Universita di Palermo al Santuario di Contrada Mango a Segesta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper reviews recent acquisitions on the Contrada Mango Sanctuary in Segesta, the result of new research and the revision of old excavations conducted by Vincenzo Tusa between the 1950s and 1960s, which brought to light a monumental peribolos and the remains of a peripteral Doric temple of the second quarter of the fifth century BC., largely stripped in the late or post-Ancient age. The University of Palermo's research began in 2016 and culminated with the edition of the old excavations in 2023 and the start of new investigations in 2022. It has allowed a first definition of the life phases of the sanctuary and to enucleate some aspects of the ritual practice carried out in the sacred area. New data also emerged from the re-examination of the topographical and monumental context of the sanctuary, concerning in particular the location of the temple within the peribolos, the possible accesses to the sanctuary and the paths outside and inside the temenos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".