La realidad lingüística en Canadá y la situación del español en Montreal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Los constantes flujos migratorios han hecho de Canadá un país multicultural y lingüísticamente diverso. En este contexto, se presenta la situación del español como lengua materna, como lengua extranjera y como lengua de herencia en Montreal, metrópoli donde el contacto español-francés se ve favorecido por la migración, las políticas de enseñanza y la percepciónlocal de la lengua extranjera. Finalmente se ejemplifican los principales procesos que ocurren en situación de contacto de lenguas y de distintas variedades del español: transferencia, acomodación, nivelación y simplificación.\nThe linguistic reality in Canada and the situation of Spanish in MontrealThe constant migration flow has contributed to the multicultural and linguistically diverse shape of Canada as a country. In this context, we present the situation of Spanish as mother tongue, as foreign language and as heritage language in Montreal, a metropolis where the Spanish-French contact is favored by migration, the current teaching policies and the local perceptions of foreign language. We conclude by describing the main processes which result from language contact situation and among other Spanish varieties: transfer, accommodation, levelling, and simplification.\nLa realtà linguistica in Canada e la situazione dello spagnolo a MontrealI costanti flussi migratori hanno fatto del Canada un paese multiculturale e linguisticamente diversificato. In questo contesto, si presenta la situazione dello spagnolo come lingua madre, come lingua straniera e come lingua dell’eredità a Montreal, la metropoli dove il contatto franco-spagnolo è favorito dalla migrazione, dalle politiche di istruzione e dalle percezioni locali della lingua straniera. Infine, si esemplificano i principali processi che avvengono in situazioni di contatto linguistico e di contatto tra le diverse varietà dello spagnolo: trasferimento, accomodazione, livellamento e semplificazione.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".