Le heros de la Monongahela : esquisse historique.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Louis, son frère aîné, étant entré dans les ordres, où il devait acquérir bientôt une si grande renommée comme orateur chrétien et plus tard en sa qualité de confesseur ordi- naire du Roi martyr, Daniel et son autre frère continuèrent les traditions militaires de la famille en remplissant tous deux, dans les fastes guerriers de la Nouvelle-France, un rôle exces- sivement brillant et glorieux.Comme tous les fils de famille qui se destinent à la car- rière des armes, le futur héros de la Monongahéla était entré très jeune dans l'armée.Il gagna à la pointe de 1 epée tous les premiers grades dans ces combats de chaque jour souvent indé- cis mais toujours renaissants entre cette autre Rome et cette autre Carthage du Nouveau-Monde qui s'appellent la Nouvelle- Angleterre et la Nouvelle-France.Suivant les correspondances du temps et certains papiers de famille, M. de Beaujeu, sans être précisément de grande taille, avait cependant haute mine, tant il était admirablement proportionné, adroit et agile dans tous les exercices
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".