LA PAROLE AU CHOCOLAT ! \nTRAUMATISMES INTIMES DE LA VIE CONTEMPORAINE \nDANS LES MANGEUSES DE CHOCOLAT DE PHILIPPE BLASBAND
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In his play Les mangeuses de chocolat Philippe Blasband tackles, with a sometimes dark humour, the problem of so-called "innocent" addictions such as the one the protagonists have with chocolate, transforming the pleasure it gives them into a compulsion that they seek to cure with group therapy, during which a series of problems linked to individual traumas will progressively manifest themselves, as well as the role that "speech", whether singular, shared or reluctant, assumes in the search for the intimate depths. \nThrough an analysis of the discourses of the eaters and the therapist, of the subjects addressed and of the relational dynamics that are established, we will examinate how Philippe Blasband reflects deeply on the meaning of literature in the contemporary world, through the staging of a compulsion associated with chocolate, a metis/plural product par excellence, dear to children and an "object of status" for adults, which Belgium's chocolate masters have brought to levels of excellence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".