MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7020612455

Measurement and simulation of nitrous oxide fluxes from perennial forage grasses and annual crops amended with pig manure and inorganic fertilizer

2020· dissertation· en· W7020612455 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerennial plantManureNitrous oxideForageFertilizerSoil waterWater contentMoisture
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crop and nutrient management on agricultural soils are essential considerations for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions in our environment. This thesis aimed to simulate and compare nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes from perennial forage grasses (FPP) and annual crops (ANN) amended with solid pig manure (SPM), liquid pig manure (LPM) and inorganic urea fertilizer (FER). Two field studies were carried out at different sites Carman and Carberry, Manitoba, Canada. At Carman, N2O fluxes were monitored from FPP following its termination and restoration. At the Carberry, N2O fluxes were measured from LPM applied to soil annually at a rate of 56,000 L ha-1, FER applied at the equivalent rate as total available N from the LPM and un-amended control (CON) plots. At Carberry, in 2011 and 2014 when applied manure N was low, emission factor and emission intensity from LPM was one-half of that from FER. At Carman, the result showed that the termination of perennial forage grasses in combination with applied manure leads to increased soil nitrogen content and N2O fluxes. However, when FPP were replanted in 2014, N2O emission from FPP was 30% less than that from ANN treatments. The data from the Carman site were used to evaluate the performance of the DeNitrification-DeComposition (DNDC) model to predict soil moisture and N2O fluxes. The DNDC model output compared well with the field observed values on the ANN (cumulative N2O flux and daily soil moisture Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) > 0.7) but not on the FPP (cumulative N2O flux and daily soil moisture NSE < 0.2). In spite of the wide use of the DNDC model, some routines in the model still needs work as seen on the FPP. In conclusion, perennial forage grass planted in rotation with annual crops can provide N saving benefits, but the N would be lost when the forage grasses are converted to annual cropland. Also, LPM can provide nutrient to crop more efficiently than FER, as less N2O was emitted to produce a unit grain of wheat, but the nutrient would be lost when applied beyond crop need. Consequently, adequate consideration for mineralizable residue from plowed down forage grasses and applied manure N may help prevent future losses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.135

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics→French-language works237,207→