"Los Tellos de Meneses" de Lope de Vega en la conformación del ideal de labrador digno
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En la primera parte del trabajo se destaca la popularidad de la que gozó la leyenda genealógica sobre la familia de los Tellos de Meneses a través de la recopilación de noticias de representación de obras que se dedicaron a este tema. El artículo se centra después en la bilogía dramática que Lope escribió sobre los orígenes de esta familia: Los Tellos de Meneses y Valor, fortuna y lealtad (segunda parte de Los Tellos de Meneses). Se analizan dos aspectos fundamentalmente: por un lado, el tratamiento que el autor hizo de las fuentes, quizá en un afán por favorecer la imagen de la familia; por otro lado, se analiza el lugar que ocupan estas dos obras de exaltación genealógica en la configuración del ideal de labrador digno. In the first part of this paper I will point out the popularity enjoyed by the genealogical legend related to the family of the Tellos de Meneses through a compilation of references to performances of plays based on the subject. The article then focuses on the theatrical duology written by Lope de Vega on the origins of this family: Los Tellos de Meneses and Valor, fortuna y lealtad (the second part of Los Tellos de Meneses). I will analyze two fundamental elements: on the one hand, the use of sources by the playwright, maybe in an attempt to improve the family"s image; on the other hand, I will analyze the place that these two plays centered on celebrating a genealogy occupy in relation to the development of the ideal of the honorable peasant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".