Making Ireland: The ‘Made in Ireland’ trade mark and the delineation of national identity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter explores the efforts of Irish nationalists to define and regulate the national identity of Ireland through the vehicle of country-of-origin trademarking. Specifically, it charts the rise of the Irish Industrial Development Association (IIDA), a voluntary organisation that from 1907 regulated the use of an Irish country-of-origin trademark, styled Déanta i nÉirinn. The chapter begins with an overview of the historical context in which the Déanta i nÉirinn was developed. It then documents the establishment and growth of the Déanta i nÉirinn trademark and its place within the broader Irish industrial development movement. Attention then turns to the Déanta i nÉirinn trademark users, revealing the sectoral and geographical breakdown. By analysing the products that carried the Déanta i nÉirinn trademark, this chapter provides a sketch of Irish identity before independence in the eyes of contemporary consumers. The IIDA also prosecuted non-Irish producers that fraudulently sold goods with Irish connotations. By analysing the defendants in these cases, this chapter provides further insights into Ireland’s brand identity before independence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.040 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".