MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7020771160

Material properties and mechanical behaviour of large-scale additively manufactured multi-layered steels

2020· dissertation· en· W7020771160 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuee-scholar@UOIT (University of Ontario Institute of Technology) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOak Ridge National LaboratoryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOak Ridge Institute for Science and EducationU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodFusible alloyTSG101DiafiltrationHyporeflexiaHemopericardiumLiquation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metal Big Area Additive Manufacturing is an additive manufacturing technique based on gas metal arc welding. The systems??? dual nozzle design prints two steels simultaneously; in this study, the test samples are made from AISI 410 stainless steel and AWS ER70S-3 mild steel. Three print patterns were designed to isolate the effects on the interface between the two materials. Deformation behaviour was analyzed by the use of two-dimensional digital image correlation. Nonhomogeneous strains and L??ders banding within the mild steel directly adjacent to the SS-MS interface were observed. There is a clear increase in strength close to the interface but no statistical change in strength between print patterns. Acicular ferrite/bainite were found close to the interface and allotriomorphic ferrite into the mild steel. A possible explanation for the changes in microstructure from is discussed by the use of electron diffraction spectroscopy, digital image correlation, microhardness, and electron backscatter diffraction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuee-scholar@UOIT (University of Ontario Institute of Technology)Same topicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesFrench-language works237,207