MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7020803283

Mental imagery and prejudice reduction: imagining intergroup contact improves attitudes toward dehumanized outgroups

2011· article· en· W7020803283 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Intergroup Psychology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutgroupIngroups and outgroupsPrejudice (legal term)DehumanizationContact hypothesisStereotype (UML)EmpathyHostilityAttributionAnxiety
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According to the contact hypothesis (Allport, 1954), face-to-face interaction between individuals of opposing groups lead to more positive outgroup attitudes. Intergroup contact theory has stimulated a large body of research and has received support across a variety of settings and social groups (Pettigrew & Tropp, 2006). More recently, a number of forms of contact beyond face-to-face have received increasing attention. Thus, research has shown that imagining intergroup contact (i.e., imagined contact) can improve outgroup attitudes. More in detail, imagined contact combines the assumptions posed by the contact hypothesis with the findings about the impact of mental simulation on social behaviour (Crisp et al., 2010). Accordingly, research has shown that imagining an intergroup encounter curtails intergroup anxiety and extends the attribution of perceivers’ positive traits to others (Crisp et al., 2010; Turner et al., 2007). The present experiment aimed at extending previous studies investigating whether imagined contact reduces hostility toward a variety of target groups. Research on direct contact showed that the relationship between actual contact and prejudice reduction remains significant across samples involving different stereotyped groups (Pettigrew & Tropp, 2006). However, no prior study on imagined contact has systematically investigated whether imagining an intergroup encounter promotes more positive attitudes toward outgroups that are ascribed different stereotypes. More importantly, prior research failed to investigate whether imagined contact could encourage more positive attitudes toward de-humanized groups (i.e., groups that face pervasive discrimination and are ascribed extremely negative stereotypes). Thus, linking research on imagined contact to the stereotype content research, we aimed at investigating whether imagined contact reduces intergroup hostility toward social groups varying on the two fundamental dimensions of group perception: warmth and competence (Fiske, Cuddy, & Glick 2007). The experiment employed a 2 (task: imagined contact vs. control) × 2 (warmth: high vs. low) × 2 (competence: high vs. low) between-subject design. Thus, depending on the experimental condition, participants (N=116) imagined either an intergroup encounter with an outgroup member differently stereotyped on warmth and competence (i.e., Chinese, Canadian, Albanian, and Filipino) or an outdoor scene. Specifically, in the experimental condition, participants were asked to imagine themselves meeting an outgroup member for the first time. Participants were further asked to imagine talking with the stranger and discovering interesting, positive, and unexpected things about that stranger. By contrast, in the control condition participants were asked to imagine a no-contact control scene involving a walk in the outdoors (see Husnu & Crisp, 2010; Stathi & Crisp, 2008). Outgroup attitude and the intention to engage in future actual contact served as criterion variables. Results showed that imagining an intergroup encounter improves attitudes and promotes greater intentions to engage in future actual contact with social groups differently perceived on warmth and competence dimensions. Moreover, the effect of imagined contact on the intentions to engage in future face-to-face encounters was mediated by intergroup attitudes. These findings nicely complement previous research showing that imagined contact can prove effective at improving attitudes toward a wide range of social groups even de-humanized groups, perceived as neither warm nor competent. Furthermore, by showing the mediating role of intergroup attitudes on intentions to engage in future actual contact, we advance our understanding of the underlying emotional mechanisms of imagined contact effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara)Same topicSocial and Intergroup PsychologyFrench-language works237,207