Bibliographic record
Abstract
Santé Canada a informé Kemin Foods, SA quâil ne\nsâopposait pas à la vente de la lutéine cristalline\nFloraGLO® à titre dâingrédient alimentaire à ajouter à une\ngrande variété dâaliments en quantités allant de 0,3 à \n10 mg/portion ou par quantité de référence aux boissons,\naux céréales, aux flans et aux garnitures, aux mélanges\nmontagnards, aux boissons à base de plante, aux\novoproduits, aux produits à tartiner semblables à la\nmargarine, aux sauces pour salade, aux desserts congelés,\naux soupes, aux friandises et en une quantité entraînant\nun apport total de 20 mg/jour dans les aliments à usage\ndiététique spécial constituant une source unique\ndâalimentation.\nLe Ministère a procédé à une évaluation approfondie de\nlâinnocuité de lâadjonction de lutéine à lâapprovisionnement\nalimentaire canadien, et ce, conformément à ses Lignes\ndirectrices relatives à lâévaluation de lâinnocuité des aliments\nnouveaux dérivés de végétaux et de microorganismes.\nLe texte qui suit résume lâavis remis par Kemin Foods, SA\nà Santé Canada ainsi que lâévaluation de Santé Canada. Il\nne contient aucun renseignement commercial\nconfidentiel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.043 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".