MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7020833390

Multiple-antenna wireless communications: detection and estimation with smart antennas, and space-time code design considerations

2009· dissertation· en· W7020833390 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2009
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmoothingCovariance matrixEstimatorMultipath propagationSubspace topologyWirelessAntenna arrayArray processingChannel (broadcasting)Signal subspace
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main theme of this thesis is wireless communications using multiple antennas. The thesis consists of four topics on smart antenna technology, its applications to direct sequence code division multiple access (DS/CDMA) communications, and multiple-input multiple-output wireless communications. The first problem under consideration is the joint estimation of direction-of-arrival (DoA), propagation delay, and complex channel gain for antenna-array DS/CDMA communications over frequency selective multipath channels. We propose a subspace based MUSIC-type estimation algorithm which utilizes the spatial smoothing preprocessing technique. The proposed algorithm essentially breaks the multipath induced coherency within the received signals and recovers the full signal subspace spanned by the dominant signal paths of all users. This allows for the use of MUSIC-type DoA and delay estimators for individual paths of a particular user. We then describe a new criterion for detecting the number of signals impinging on a uniform linear array (ULA), which exploits eigenvector information of the sample array covariance matrix and makes explicit use of the peak information of the MUSIC spectrum. In the third part we present an iterative weight matrix approximation (IWMA) algorithm. IWMA computes an approximation to the optimum weight matrix used by weighted spatial smoothing (WSS) to completely decorrelate input sources and generate a diagonal source covariance matrix. A useful observation regarding IWMA is that the generated matrix is suitable as a basis for subspace-type DoA estimation. In the last part we discuss two deterministic measures for designing linear processing space-time

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.668
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207