Mineralización de las zonas de Colquipucro y Ayawilka, Proyecto Colquipucro, San Pedro de Pillao-Pasco
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The foregoing treatise serves as Thesis to obtain the professional degree of Geologist Engineer of the Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería (National University of Engineering), Faculty of Geological, Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, and Professional School of Geological Engineering. It was performed the study of mineralization in the areas of Colquipucro and Ayawilka, property of the Canadian explorer junior company TINKA RESOURCES S.A.C., located at the community of Colquipucro in the region of Pasco. \nThese areas have been explored by many companies during the years, such as Buenaventura, and Sierra Minerals; Tinka Resources obtained the concession in 2007. \nInside the lithological units located in the project area, it has been recognized Excelsior Group, Mitu Group, Pucará Group, and Goyllarisquizga Group. \nThe exploration areas Ayawilka and Colquipucro have polymetallic mineralization of Cu, Pb, Zn, and Ag. The mineralogy presented in the areas corresponds to chalcopyrite, galena, sphalerite, among the minerals with economic value and others related to them; highlighting the presence of pyrrhotite. Its mining resources are in the order of 13.3 million of TM with 5.8 million of ounces of Ag which makes this area a mining project of exploratory interest. (The resource calculation must be indicated through the respective NI 43101 or JORC). \nAccording to the studies performed until now in the areas of Colquipucro and Ayawilka, and in the basis of the interpretation of mineralization characteristics of the deposit, the Colquipucro project could be related to the model type polymetallic stratabound of Pb-Zn-Cu-Mo hosted in sedimentary rocks type limestone of Pucará Group of the lower Jurassic. With this new interpretation proposal, it is expected to also contribute to improve the knowledge and economical expectation of the project for further mining operations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".