MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7020914803

Modelling RC bridge columns under the combined effects of traffic and reinforcement corrosion

2010· article· en· W7020914803 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete Corrosion and Durability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpallBridge (graph theory)CorrosionDeflection (physics)TruckFinite element methodReinforcementBeam bridge
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a numerical model of individual and compound effects of traffic and corrosion-induced damage in RC bridge columns on the dynamic performance of the bridge superstructure. The procedure includes two time-dependent cycles presenting each process: an external cycle, which represents the corrosion process, and an internal cycle, which performs time-history analysis of the bridge under traffic load. The slab-on-girder bridge is modelled as a beam-on-two-columns system (BOTC) using a two-dimensional finite element method, and the truck is modelled as a two-degree of freedom dynamic system integrated with the bridge model. Corrosion-induced damage is introduced through the reduction of the reinforcing steel area and spalling of the concrete cover. It is found that the model is efficient in simulating the static and dynamic behaviour of slab-on-girder bridges. From the case study, it is found that although reinforcement corrosion of the bridge columns significantly reduces their capacity, it only causes a marginal increase in the bridge superstructure dynamic deflection under the dynamic movement of the truck.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicConcrete Corrosion and DurabilityFrench-language works237,207