MODEL KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK DAN TEORI PERUBAHAN KEBIJAKAN
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dalam buku ini diuraikan konsep kebijakan publicc, proses kebikajan, evaluasi kebijakan serta berbagai teori implementasi mulai dari teori generassi pertama (Top-down), teori generasi ke dua (Button-up), teori generasi ke dua (Botton-up), teori generasi ketiga (Sintetis), juga membahas secara lengkap teori yang menyebabkan perubbahan kebijakan yakni teori ACF (Advocation coalition Framework). Buku ini diluncurkan dengan harapan agar para pembaca dapat memahami berbagai konsep dan teori dalam kebijakan public untuk dapat dijadikan sebagai konsep alternative dalam mengkaji ilmu administrasi public pada khususnya dan ilmu sosial dan ilmu politik pada umumnya.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it