Model of psychological disadaptation at psychosomatic and neurotic disorders
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
© 2015, Canadian Center of Science and Education. All rights reserved. The relevance of the studied problem is caused by the lack of the uniform model of psychological disadaptation of the persons suffering from the neurotic and psychosomatic disorders. The article is directed on acquaintance of the clinical psychologists with the model of the psychological disadaptation at psychosomatic and neurotic disorders and recommendations with the work with these categories of clients. The leading approach to research of this problem is the comparative approach to research of the existing disadaptation models. The main result of this research is the creation of the new model of the psychological disadaptation including mechanisms of psychological protection, coping and anticipation. The materials of the article can be useful for the clinical psychologists and psychotherapists during the work with the persons suffering from psychosomatic and neurotic disorders and also for psychologists-consultants during the work with the clients who are in a crisis or difficult life situation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it