MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7021016858

A mouse model for the selective ablation of proliferating myeloid cells /

2004· dissertation· en· W7021016858 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2004
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Innovation and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrogliaGenetically modified mouseMyeloidThymidine kinaseImmune systemGanciclovirCell cultureCentral nervous system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microglia are the resident immune cells of the central nervous system (CNS). Although the microglial response can be beneficial, there is increasing evidence for detrimental effects of the microglial activation in cases of acute CNS trauma and neurodegenerative disorders. To better understand the role of these cells in CNS pathogenesis, we have created a mouse model with selective and conditional ablation of microglia as well as other cells of myeloid origin in proliferation. To achieve the elimination of proliferating microglia, transgenic mice that express the suicidal gene herpes simplex virus 1 thymidine kinase (HSV-1 TK) driven by the myeloid specific promoter CD11b were generated. HSV-1 TK is itself unable to mediate cell death. However, unlike the mammalian thymidine kinase, HSV-1 TK is capable of phosphorylating specific nucleoside analogues such as ganciclovir which lead during cell proliferation to inhibition of DNA synthesis and cell death. Here, we will describe the creation and the characterization of CD11b-TK mouse lines that can be used to ablate proliferating myeloid cells in paradigms of acute CNS injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicEducation, Innovation and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207