New combinations in Senegalia (Fabaceaee: Mimosoideae) for Australia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Maslin, B.R. New combinations in Senegalia (Fabaceae: Mimosoideae) for Australia.Nuytsia 22(6): 465^168.The genus Acacia Mill.( s. lat .) is now regarded as comprising five genera, one of which is Senegalia Raf.This genus is represented in Australia by just four species, two native and two introduced.The following new combinations are made in order to facilitate the completion of a revised edition of the Flora of Australia Vol. 11: Senegalia chundra (Roxb.ex Rottler) Maslin, S. pennata (L.) Maslin and S. pennata subsp.kerrii (I.C.Nielsen) Maslin.Introduction Molecular and other evidence has shown that the former, broadly circumscribed genus Acacia Mill, is polyphyletic and is now regarded as comprising five genera, Acacia {s.str .),Acaciella Britton & Rose, Mariosousa Seigler & Ebinger, Senegalia Raf. and Vachellia Wight & Arn.(see Miller & Seigler 2012 for an overview of this generic classification).The pan-tropical genus Senegalia (syn.Acacia subgen.Aculeiferum Vassal) is represented in Australia by just four species, two native and two introduced.Names in Senegalia are available for two of these taxa, both of which occur in north Queensland, namely, the native S. albizioides (Pedley) Pedley (syn. A. albizioides Pedley) and the introduced S. rugata (Lam.)Britton & Rose (syn. A. concinna (Willd.)DC. and A. sinuata (Lour.)Merr.).New combinations in Senegalia are provided below for the remaining two species, one native and one introduced, in order that they may be available for use in a revised edition of the Flora of Australia Vol. 11 (Orchard & Wilson 2001) that is currently being prepared by the author.The synonymy which forms the basis for this paper is that of previous authors whose works are referenced under the respective taxa below.None of the cited type specimens has been seen by the present author but reference is provided to other author's examination of types where these have been undertaken.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".