Note di alcuni frati di Santa Croce nei margini del Plut. 15 dex. 6 della Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana di Firenze un aggiornamento francescano e fiorentino al "Martirologio" di Adone di Vienne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. il manoscritto firenze, biblioteca medicea laurenziana, plut.15 dex.6Il codice Pluteo 15 destro 6 della Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana di Firenze (d'ora in poi: Plut.15 dex.6), proveniente dal convento di Santa Croce, reca sui margini elementi che ne tracciano una storia di permanenza fiorentina rimasta a lungo inosservata.Benché il manufatto sia ampiamente noto per la presenza di un testo poetico, il cosiddetto Ritmo Laurenziano, che si colloca alle origini della letteratura in volgare, alcune note ne attestano l'uso da parte dei frati del convento di Santa Croce nel XIV secolo e aprono ulteriori prospettive di ricerca sul panorama grafico dello scriptorium francescano.Il codice contiene il martirologio di Adone di Vienne, composto quasi certamente a Lione fra l'859 e l'860.Tuttavia, l'esemplare in questione appare un prodotto toscano databile alla prima metà del XII secolo, con pos-S.Orsino -F.Salvestrini, Note di alcuni frati di Santa Croce nei margini del Plut.15 dex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".