MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7021142257

NEP 2020 : reversing the trend of brain drain from elite schools of India?

2021· other· en· W7021142257 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTheseus (Ammattikorkeakoulujen) · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicContemporary Christian Leadership and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEliteTransformative learningBrain drainHigher educationHuman capitalInternational educationQuality (philosophy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The yearning for high quality education and better employment opportunities has compelled millions of bright and talented Indian students to explore better prospects overseas for years. Several studies indicate that in the last two decades, more than half of the high school toppers have left the country to countries such as UK, USA and Canada because of the many push factors in India. To crackdown this trend, India has recently proposed few transformative re-forms in the National Education Policy( NEP 2020) \n \nThe purpose of this thesis was to investigate whether the NEP 2020 reforms in higher education would limit brain drain from elite schools of India. The response of guidance counsellors from elite private schools of India was used to gather the primary data for this study. Based on the theoretical framework, previous studies on human capital, student mobility and guidance counselling were examined. The research questions were selected on the basis of the theoretical study related to education policies in higher education and their link to human capital theory and international student mobility. In addition, guidance counselling theories were included to understand counselling practices in students’ transition to tertiary education. As the study was commissioned by an EdTech company which provided support for college counselling, the study also explored if the current features in their tool was equipped to handle the new demand for Indian universities in light of the reforms in NEP 2020. \n \nThe research involved collecting data using a survey and group interview of counsellors and for this sequential mixed method was adopted. Quantitative data was collected by surveying counsellors with close ended questions while qualitative data was gathered by interviewing counsellors with semistructured questions. 47 counsellors from elite schools of India participated in the survey. Further clarification was sought to gather deeper insights on the future trends in Indian student mobility by interviewing three of these counsellors. Overall, the results indicate that, the brain drain is most likely going to reverse because of the reforms proposed in NEP 2020 and as a result the country stands to benefit eventually from the human capital gain. However, further research is required to determine other externalities which could influence student mobility trends.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheseus (Ammattikorkeakoulujen)Same topicContemporary Christian Leadership and EducationFrench-language works237,207