MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7021167928

Multi-location testing to identify oat germplasm with partial resistance to crown rust

2013· other· en· W7021167928 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)) · 2013
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHome-Grown Cereals AuthorityDepartment for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government
KeywordsGermplasmCultivarRust (programming language)Crown (dentistry)GreenhouseResistance (ecology)Plant disease resistance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Partial resistance to cereal rusts is characterized by reduction in pathogen reproduction despite a susceptible infection type (Parlevliet, 1985). In some pathosystems (e.g. blast in tropical lowland rice) such resistance has proved to be durable (Bonman et al., 1992). To identify oat germplasm with partial resistance to crown rust, caused by Puccinia coronata, a multilocation screening trial was initiated in 2002. Eighty-six entries were tested at 3 locations planted in the fall of 2002 in the southern US and at 5 locations planted in the spring of 2003 in the midwestern US and Canada using at least 2 replications per site. The line MN841804 was the resistant check and cultivars Brooks and Otana were susceptible checks. The resistant check showed an average disease level of 7.5% relative to the susceptible checks across locations. One entry, the cultivar CDC Boyer, may have a useful level of partial resistance for areas less prone to the disease. In the present study it averaged 24.5% disease relative to the checks across locations. CDC Boyer and 26 other lines showing relative severity values between 3% and 25% and low variation between locations were selected for further testing in 2004. Also, adult plants of CDC Boyer, OT389 (12.1% across locations) and IA98822-2 (17.6% across locations), are undergoing greenhouse tests with compatible races of P. coronata. Further field and greenhouse experiments are planned with these and other lines to ascertain if the lower disease level in field trials is correlated with partial resistance assessed in controlled inoculations. Bonman, J.M. et al. 1992. Annual Review Phytopathology 30:507-528; Parlevliet, J.E. 1985. In: Roelfs, A.P. and W.R. Bushnell (eds.) The Cereal Rusts vol. II. New York, Academic Press, Inc. p. 501-525.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke))French-language works237,207