MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7021250817

Necessary treason: allegiance and citizenship in transnational literature since mid-century

2018· dissertation· en· W7021250817 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPatient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersBoston College
KeywordsAllegianceCitizenshipLegitimacyHuman rightsPoliticsContext (archaeology)State (computer science)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After the Second World War, calls for world citizenship were countered by increased demands for national loyalty and patriotism. Many newly formed or independent states configured definitions of citizenship along ideological, religious, or non-territorial lines. By contrast, the Charter of the United Nations (1945) and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) propounded global allegiances and affiliations. The conflict between international and national allegiance is inherent to postwar global structures and their subjects. In the context of totalitarianism and other forms of colonialism, allegiance to the state constitutes a breach of the civil contract: the implicit endorsement of human and civil rights violations through allegiance runs counter to the dialectic of rights and responsibilities fundamental to citizenship. In such a context, non-state allegiance—which is to say, treason—becomes necessary in order to reclaim citizenship and salvage the civil contract.Attending to various modes of political resistance writing across the late-20th and early-21st centuries, “Necessary Treason” asks critical questions about demands for loyalty made both by states and by non-state actors and organizations since 1945. Across diverse social, political, and national contexts, I focus on writers and theorists who question the legitimacy of state citizenship and envision alternative modes of belonging and structures of affiliation. In prose that blurs the line between fiction and nonfiction, Rebecca West and Muriel Spark employ melodrama as an experimental mode for investigations of shifting Cold War loyalties. Writing against the Soviet regime in Czechoslovakia, Václav Havel and Milan Kundera formulate anti-political literary modes to undermine the state. In the context of apartheid South Africa, Mongane Wally Serote and Nadine Gordimer experiment with literary forms as essential supplements to their own anti-apartheid activism. Finally, Abdulrazak Gurnah and Caryl Phillips, challenging state sanctioned and institutionalized racisms, reject exclusionary community formation and advocate instead for transnational, multidirectional affiliations. In each case, literary modes operate in tandem with embodied forms of political activism, and therefore constitute a crucial component of resistance. Literary modes perform and challenge state-sanctioned categories of belonging and civic duty. In the context of oppressive state formations, literature makes way for alternative citizenships and relationships of responsibility among individuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0160.069
Scholarly communication0.0150.020
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicPatient Satisfaction in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207