Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 2010 there was a striking visual representation of transactions of Australian indigenous testimony beyond the nation at the Winnipeg Art Gallery. As part of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) hearings in Canada, the gallery featured Cathy Busby’s installation WE ARE SORRY, which presented the text of the apology of the Australian prime minister to the Stolen Generations in Australia alongside the apology to the First Nations on the issue of the Residential Schools in Canada, both offered in 2008. The installation mirrored an earlier synchronic display at the Laneways Commissions project in Melbourne in 2009, where WE ARE SORRY was projected onto the exterior of a power substation. This graphic statement of the proximity of testimonial cultures across two settler nations in the recent past maps ideoscapes and mediascapes that connect testimonial narratives beyond the nation – Busby’s artwork literally projects a response to indigenous testimony onto these geographically remote public spaces to signify a shared history of racialized child removal and founding violence. In this way, it creates a transnational site of witness and an imaginative reconceptualization of space that projects an ethics of witness into the public spaces of very different kinds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".