MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7022806219

A musical layering

2013· other· en· W7022806219 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueChalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology) · 2013
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMusicalOperaOpera houseDanceMusical instrumentSpace (punctuation)Lecture hall
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Montreal, the multicultural city of Canada, a college of moderate size with a very strong music program intends to construct on their campus a performance hall primarily for opera.The hall will be used by student as well as professional opera performers.The main purpose of the hall will be the traditional opera program, the hall will also have a multipurpose function that's allow musical theater, orchestral concerts, chamber music, dance and occasional lecture.The building program: Performance hall with an audience seating that allow 1200 seats where 40% of the seats are placed in the two or three levels balconies.The orchestra pit should accommodate an orchestra of approximately 70 musicians and variable acoustics should be considered.The scene shop, dressing rooms and costume shop should have adequate sound isolation.The rehearsal room should be planed and require a space with daylight for dancers, small instrument and chorus.The lobby should serve as the entrance and have same other facilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0070.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it