MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7023198529

Libyoaethiopes

2012· article· fr· W7023198529 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican history and culture analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpposition (politics)Closure (psychology)Focus (optics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mentionnés par Orose (Hist., 1, 2, 88), on ne sait s’il s’agit de métis ou d’Éthiopiens de Libye par opposition aux Éthiopiens de la rive droite du Nil (supposés asiatiques). Ils semblent situés par Orose au sud-ouest de l’Égypte, au sud de la Cyrénaïque et, d’après l’orientation de la description, au voisinage des Garamantes*, considérés eux-mêmes parfois comme des « Faces-brûlées », mais le plus souvent distingués de celles-ci. Orose précise que les Libyoaethiopes, tout comme les Garamantes...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.781
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.030
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0640.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicAfrican history and culture analysisFrench-language works237,207