Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interactive sound project: a music player in the work constructs a data-base of cover versions of famous songs found on the Internet, then plays these songs sequentially, effecting a "single" song from the different compositions. Awarded an honorary mention at 'Art on the Net' Tokyo (2001-2). Loop_reprise is a software program that plays different versions of well-known songs. It consists of specially written software\n\nthat is available on a CD Rom which also contains the database of songs that forms the content of the work. The CD is then\n\nplayable through any computer. There are currently four different versions of the project, each focusing on a separate song (La\n\nMer, Danny Boy, Muss I Den, Guantanamera). The project allows a user to play the different versions of the (same) song\n\nsequentially as a series of repetitions. In looping the song through its different manifestations a unique sound is created that\n\ncuts a section through its different cultural interpretations.\n\nLoop_reprise makes contributions to the digital arts in two ways: as the project re-used ostensibly copyrighted digital material in\n\nthe form of songs, it aimed to highlight how new copyright laws were impacting on longstanding artistic practices (e.g. the re-use\n\nof found objects as artworks). Additionally, the work proposed that interesting links can be made between old and new cultural\n\nforms, e.g. the repetitious unit as a formal device from minimalism, with the ‘repeated loop’ from digital multimedia.\n\nLoop_reprise was awarded a festival prize by jury selection for ‘Art on the Net’ at Machida City Museum of Arts in Tokyo (with 15\n\nother artists in the gallery, 30 other non-award winning prizes were featured in an online gallery). The project was also curated\n\nfor the Soundtoys website which toured to a number of international venues including ICA; New Forms Festival (Canada) and\n\nthe Garage Festival Germany.\n\nThe project was made using Macromedia Director and songs found and downloaded from the Internet. Concept and production\n\nsolely by Corby.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.246 | 0.131 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".