Optimización y Reinvención del espacio Urbano Canadiense
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Densifying urban spaces leads to uncertainty with regard to investments and time. In the context of a pilot project and based on the important loss of Montreal�s1971 primary downtown population, this study considers the 1991�2001 development trends, taken from the Canadian official census, to estimate which attraction power in terms of re-densification expectations for Montreal will be most likely to exert the greatest effect on the population in 2026 to result in a 100% recovery of its original demographics. The implicit purpose is to know if the implemented planning process by re-densifying the downtown will attenuate the unbridled peripheral densification. Extrapolations made on populations considered as representative of the future expected profiles found that these will fluctuate between 50% and 90% recovery of the 1971 original base by the year 2026. The study concludes that the attractiveness and power of the Municipality of Montreal to recuperate its total population and diminish peripheral growth will be more significant during later stages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it