MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7023460798

Optimal Load Management Application for Industrial Customers

2015· dissertation· en· W7023460798 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemand responseSmart gridLoad managementLoad shiftingScheduleEnergy managementContext (archaeology)Demand managementRenewable energyGreenhouse gas
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The urgent need for greater planning and operation efficiency of current and future electrical networks, as well as the reduction of environmental impact due to current levels of greenhouse gas emissions have led to the development of the Smart Grid concept. In this context, the integration of renewable sources to the transmission and distribution systems, and the management of customer's consumption through direct or indirect control methods are two important components of smart grids. The latter, in particular, has led to the emergence of Demand Side Management (DSM) programs with the main purpose of controlling demand levels considering end-user preferences or the final service quality. \n \nIn the case of developed countries, the industrial sector requires significant and growing amounts of energy year after year. For this reason, considering the special characteristics imposed by industrial processes, DSM programs that focus on rational and efficient electric consumption have been designed to improve the current operation practice of this sector. In particular, load shifting, which is part of Demand Response (DR) programs in the context of DSM, together with dynamic pricing schemes, such as Time of Use (TOU) and Real Time Pricing (RTP), are attractive approaches for demand management. With this goal in mind, the present research focuses on the development and evaluation of an optimization model to optimally schedule water-cooled chillers in industrial applications. \n \nThe proposed optimization model is capable of minimizing energy and/or peak demand costs associated with normal operation of chillers, depending on the priority of the industrial consumer, while meeting demand-supply balance, process, peak demand constraints, and operating limits at the same time. To represent the chiller active power demand at every time interval, a polynomial regression model is proposed, and estimated by means of a robust regression technique using actual load demand and process measurements at an actual industrial facility, showing that the resulting regression model determines the chiller electric consumption accurately for normal operating conditions; a Chilled Water Storage (CWS), i.e. a thermal storage device for water cooling systems, is also considered in this model. The final optimization model is tested to find the optimal scheduling of chillers in a water cooling system of an automotive frame manufacturing plant in Ontario. Two different cost minimization scenarios are simulated to determine the better operation strategy and contrasted with the actual operation to evaluate the possible monthly bill savings that can be achieved. Finally, the optimal size of the CWS is determined, to maximize savings, for the current number of chillers as well as with the possible decommissioning of one of them, as requested by the facility technical staff. \n \nThe final results suggest that load shifting of chillers could be a successful strategy for industrial customers, since important electricity bill savings without affecting the normal plant operation were attained. This was possible due to an optimal chiller scheduling and indirect incentives provided by current industry energy price schemes in Ontario. Furthermore, the optimization model presented permitted to optimally size the CWS in the water cooling system studied, so that electricity costs were minimized depending \non the total chiller capacity considered. Therefore, optimization approaches to \nschedule industrial processes could be a powerful tool to increase the operational efficiency of industrial plants to reduce their significant energy costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207