MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7023583325

Parutions. Emmanuel GUY et Laurence LE BRAS (sous la direction de), Guy Debord. Un art de la guerre. Paris, Éd. BnF et Éd. Gallimard, 2013, 224 p. Ill. n/b. et couleurs Patrick MARCOLINI, Le mouvement situationniste. Une histoire intellectuelle. Montreuil, Éd. L’Échappée, 2013, 344 p. Jacqueline BEAUDRY DION, Jean-Pierre DION, Wanda Rozynska, Stanley Rozynski, au coeur de la céramique en Estrie, © Musée du Haut-Richelieu, 2013, 38 p. www.museeduhaut-richelieu.com Francine COUTURE et coll., Variations et pérennité des oeuvres contemporaines ?, Québec, Éditions MultiMondes, coll. Cahiers de l’Institut du patrimoine de l’UQAM, 2013, 178 p. www.multim.com Joëlle ZASK, Outdoor Art. La sculpture et ses lieux, Éditions La découverte, Paris 2013. 240 p. www.editionsladecouverte.fr Laurent PILON, Résine et complexité matérielle. Traité sur la manoeuvre de la résine en sculpture. © 2012 Presses de l’Université du Québec, 319 p. www.puq.ca Léopold L. Foulem, Singularités / Singularities, Musée national des beaux-arts du Québec, 2013. 128 p. www.mnbaq.qc.ca

2013· article· fr· W7023583325 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueÉrudit (Université de Montréal) · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Identity and Heritage
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)White (mutation)Relation (database)Subject (documents)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d'auteur.L'utilisation des services d'Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d'utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.250

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0750.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueÉrudit (Université de Montréal)Same topicCultural Identity and HeritageFrench-language works237,207