MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7023630230

Optical music recognition of square notation using generative adversarial networks

2021· dissertation· en· W7023630230 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Music Media and Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkflowNotationGenerative grammarSet (abstract data type)Deep learningArtificial neural networkMusical notationTraining setAdversarial system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Manually converting Medieval chant manuscripts, written in square notation, to a computer-readable format is costly.Optical Music Recognition (OMR), which automatically performs the conversion from scanned manuscript images, can potentially reduce this cost.Machine learning models can be used to perform OMR, though they often require large amounts of labelled training data.In this work, a generative adversarial network (GAN) is trained to generate images of the individual notes and symbols that make up square notation.A GAN entangles two neural networks in a game, where one is progressively trained to generate increasingly realistic images based on a training set to fool a second network, which iteratively evaluates whether the generated examples appear as real as the training set.The music symbols generated by the GAN are placed on staff lines on synthetic manuscript pages, mimicking the appearance and structure of a real page of square notation.A novel OMR workflow is introduced that includes two sequential machine learning OMR models used in sequence: the first for object detection of musical symbols, the second for determining the vertical staff position of the notes.The baseline OMR workflow experiments are trained with real manuscript images only, and their results are compared against the OMR workflow trained with both real and synthetic manuscript images.Two medieval manuscripts, the Salzinnes Antiphonal and the Einsiedeln Stiftsbibliothek Codex 611(89) are used for the experiments.Comparing against the baseline real data experiments, an increase in the OMR workflow's evaluation metrics demonstrates that the OMR of square notation is improved by training the workflow with both real and synthetic data, assisted by the GAN architecture.Experimental results indicate that the OMR of square notation can be improved by using GAN-synthesized manuscript data.Thank you to all of my colleagues in the Music Technology program at McGill, who inspired me to pursue this work.Specifically, within the Distributed Digital Music Archives and Libraries (DDMAL) Laboratory, I would like to thank Gabriel Vigliensoni for his continued mentoring and introduction to the world of Music Information Retrieval (MIR).Thank you for taking interest in my pursuits, repeatedly editing my thesis proposal, and showing me so much of what the music scene in Montral has to offer.Thank you to Andrew Kam for jogging some ideas about how to envision this

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicMusic and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207