MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7023662341

An Official handbook of information relating to the Dominion of Canada.

2014· article· en· W7023662341 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDominionGovernment (linguistics)ConfidentialityInformation system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mechanics and Labourers extent, the number of telephone messages sent yearly being about sixty- four millions.N The Canadians are well supplied with newspapers.Every e press P6r considerable village in the Dominion publishes its newspaper, and in all the large towns there are several.These newspapers are for the most part conducted with energy and ability.They are supplied with full telegraphic reports from all parts of the globe.All important DOMINION OF CANADA.of water is from 9 to 14 feet, and works are in progress which will make the whole route available for vessels drawing 14 feet.There is also a canal system to overcome the difficulties of the River Ottawa between Montreal and Ottawa ; one opens navigation between Ottawa and Kingston, and another connects Lake Champlain with the St.Lawrence.In Nova Scotiathe St. Peter's Canal connects St. Peter's Bay with the Bras d'Or Lakes.There is also navigation on the lakes in the North-west, and on the Red River, the Assiniboine and the Saskatchewan, the latter being navigable for over 1,000 miles.These water highways are much used for the conveyance of various products, and are of great benefit to the Dominion.The consolidated revenue for the year ending 30th June, Revenue.1891, was made up as follows : -Customs §23,399,301 Excise 6,914,850 Other sources 8,265,160 $38,579,311The expenditure during the same period was $36,343,568.The deficits of 1884-5 and 1885-6 were largely owing to unforeseen expenses in connection with the North-west Rebellion.The following are the receipts and expenditure on account of the Consolidated Fund since 1880.They show that in the eleven years: the surplus revenue, after deducting the deficits before referred to, has amounted to seventeen million dollars.-Receipts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0100.023
Science and technology studies0.0090.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0770.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.160
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→