MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7023683701

Ottawas Ultimatum an die NATO: 1000 Soldaten sollen das kanadische Kontingent in Kandahar unterstützen

2008· other· de· W7023683701 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2008
Typeother
Languagede
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDynamite
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Im Januar 2008 hat das »Independent Panel on Canada's Future Role in Afghanistan« in Ottawa seinen mit Spannung erwarteten Abschlussbericht vorgelegt. Die vom früheren Außenminister John Manley geleitete Kommission hat der Regierung Harper empfohlen, die unbefristete Fortführung der kanadischen ISAF-Mission in Kandahar nach 2009 an die Erfüllung von zwei zentralen Vorbedingungen zu knüpfen: Erstens müsse die Regierung Helikopter und unbemannte Luftfahrzeuge beschaffen. Zweitens müsse in Kandahar eine zusätzliche Kampftruppe mit 1000 Soldaten von anderen NATO-Mitgliedern bzw. Staaten, die an der ISAF-Mission teilnehmen, bereitgestellt werden. Dieses kanadische Ultimatum wird die Agenda des Bukarester NATO-Gipfels im April bestimmen

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0070.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1140.038

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207