Pengaruh Food Quality, Service Quality, Ambience dan Price terhadap Customer Satisfaction di Restoran Domicile Surabaya
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh food quality, service quality, ambience quality, dan price terhadap customer satisfaction pelanggan restoran khas Jepang di Surabaya. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data primer yang diperoleh dari penyebaran kuesioner. Sampel dalam penelitian ini yaitu sebanyak 100 responden dengan kriteria yaitu pernah makan di restoran khas Jepang di Surabaya lebih dari satu kali, dan dalam tiga bulan terakhir minimal telah mengunjungi restoran khas Jepang di Surabaya. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan yaitu non probability sampling. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif melalui pengujian secara statistik. Analisis yang digunakan yaitu analisis regresi linier berganda dengan menggunakan perangkat lunak SPSS. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa food quality, service quality, ambience quality, dan price masing-masing berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap customer satisfaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it