MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7023771933

Order-disorder, polytypes and twinning in the crystal structure of vurroite

2005· article· en· W7023771933 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonoclinic crystal systemCrystal twinningOrthorhombic crystal systemCrystal structureSymmetry (geometry)Crystal (programming language)Symmetry operation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vurroite, ideally Pb20Sn2(Bi,As)22S54Cl6, is a complex mineral type, where the two minor chemical components, Sn and Cl, act as essential constituents together with Pb, Bi, As and S 1, 2. X-ray single crystal data on vurroite strongly indicate an orthorhombic Fcentred symmetry 1, 3. In this study the crystal structure of vurroite is interpreted as an OD structure belonging to the category III of OD structures composed of equivalent layers 4. The application of the OD procedures allowed the derivation of the OD-groupoid family (λ and σ operations), as well as the MDO (Maximum Degree of Order) structures. The layer symmetry (λ) is A(2)mm, the interlayer symmetry (σ) consists of a glide plane n1/2,1/2 and two-fold screw axes parallel to 010 and 001 with the translation components ¼ b and ¼ c, respectively. For this OD family two MDO polytypes exists. The former has monoclinic symmetry, C12/c1, whereas the latter is monoclinic, P12/c1. The OD treatment of the crystal structure of vurroite allowed to prove that the true symmetry of this mineral is monoclinic and that the apparent orthorhombic symmetry observed for the X-ray pattern of the measured crystal is due to a twinning phenomenon. Prof. S. Merlino is gratefully acknowledged for his contribution on the OD interpretation of the structure of vurroite. 1 Pinto D., PhD thesis, University of Bari, 2004, 165. 2 Garavelli A.,Mozgova N.N., Orlandi P., Bonaccorsi E., Pinto D., Borodaev Y., Canadian Mineralogist, 2005, in press. 3 Pinto D., Balić-Žunić T., Bonaccorsi E., Makovicky E., 26th Nordic Geological Winter Meeting, Uppsala, Sweden,2004, 106-107, abstract. 4 Dornberger-Schiff K., Abh. Dtsch. Akad. Wiss. Berlin. Kl. Chem. Geol. Biol., 1964, 3, 1-107.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.581
Threshold uncertainty score0.434

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa)Same topicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence AnalysisFrench-language works237,207