MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7023811773

Pour en lire plus : Gaston Pineau - Trajet d’un forgeron de la formation. Regards croisés de compagnes et compagnons de route

2017· review· fr· W7023811773 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2017
Typereview
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPsychodrama and Leishmaniasis Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubject (documents)Context (archaeology)Action (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En septembre dernier, Gaston Pineau qui a été chercheur au département d’Éducation Permanente de l’Université de Montréal, puis professeur à l’Université de Tours en France, a été reçu comme professeur émérite de l’Université du Québec à Montréal par le Centre de recherche en éducation et formation relatives à l’environnement et à l’Écocitoyenneté. C’est une excellente occasion pour découvrir l’ouvrage collectif « Gaston Pineau : Trajet d’un forgeron de la formation » qui présente sa double ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.174

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicPsychodrama and Leishmaniasis StudiesFrench-language works237,207