Petitioner's Observations (February 2007) for the Redress of Violations of Human Rights Guaranteed by The American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man, Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canada has violated James Roger Demers' right to freedom of expression.In 1996, government officials in British Columbia arrested him, jailed him for seven weeks awaiting trial, and then tried and convicted him for violating the Access to Abortion Services Act.The Act outlaws even the most peaceful pro-life communication with women in the proximity of abortion clinics and carries a criminal sentence of up to one year in prison and $10,000 in fines.Mr.Demers exercised his freedom of expression in the most peaceful manner imaginable.He silently held a sign in a public place.The sign simply quoted a portion Article 4 of the American Convention on Human Rights.He created no disturbance, trespassed on no one's property, and harassed no one.Mr. Demers has not submitted the subject of this complaint to any other international settlement proceeding nor is he aware of
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.015 | 0.024 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".