MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7023838346

Phase equilibrium and liquid mole fraction measurements of tetra-n-butylammonium chloride-carbon dioxide methane-semi-clathrates

2017· dissertation· en· W7023838346 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaMcGill University
KeywordsMole fractionFraction (chemistry)Activity coefficientPhase equilibriumPhase (matter)Liquid phaseThermodynamic equilibrium
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gas hydrates have many potential industrial applications in gas storage and transportation, particularly for the purpose of reducing energy consumption thus carbon footprint in the transportation of natural gas.Regarding gas storage, the possibility of reducing greenhouse gas emissions via the sequestration of carbon dioxide in the form of gas hydrates.However, to scale up these technologies a fundamental understanding of their formation is required.They require high pressures and low temperatures to form.One of the low-cost alternatives consists of using thermodynamic promoters such as tetra-n-butylammonium chloride (TBAC).These promoters reduce the hydrate equilibrium conditions making them more energetically favorable, allowing higher temperatures and lower pressures to form hydrates.This thesis investigates and studies the three-phase equilibrium conditions and liquid mole fraction measurements of CH4-TBAC-H2O and CO2-TBAC-H2O semi-clathrates.The importance of these liquid mole fraction measurements is for use in reactor design and kinetic models.Concentrations of 5-wt%, 10-wt% and 15-wt % of TBAC were employed.Results from this study show that the thermodynamic promoter used has a significant effect in reducing the semi-clathrate equilibrium conditions for both methane and carbon dioxide.For methane, a pressure range of 0.8 MPa to 4.7 MPa, a temperature range of 280 to 290 K were used with a corresponding mole fraction range from 0.37x10 -3 to 1.88x10 -3 .For carbon dioxide, the pressure range was from 0.1 to 2.4 MPa and temperature was varied from 277 to 288 K with a corresponding mole fraction from 1.42x10 -3 to 18.75x10 -3 .opportunity you gave me to be part of your research group.It has been a pleasure to be part of McGill under your supervision.When I look back to remember the times as a master's student, I will always remember the good moments we all the group had in the BBQs, meetings, and visits to the office.The culmination of this work would not have been the same without the help of my lab and office colleagues Faraz Rajput, Jason Ivall and Francois Pelletier, especially Ahmad Kahn and Jean-Sebastian Renault-Crispo.Without your help Seb, it would have been harder.I thank you very much for the unconditional support you gave me since the first days.The ideas, guidance, and support you gave me in my project were very significant to me making the path clearer and more understandable.Querer es poder, es una de las frases con más años viviendo dentro de mi cabeza.La escuché de mi mamá que siempre me han alentado a seguir adelante.Escribo estas líneas para agradecerle infinitamente a mi mamá Lupita Sandoval y a mi papá Rafa Marín por haberme formado, orientado y educado de la increíble forma que lo hicieron convirtiéndome en la persona que soy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicPhase Equilibria and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207