On the Portrait of Mikuláš Mušinka
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mikuláš Mušinka (Mykola Mušinka, 1936) is a prominent figure in research on Slovak-Ukrainian cultural relations in the 20th century. As an ethnologist by profession he was not only interested in folklore studies but also in linguistics, history of literature and arts, bibliography. The paper presents the troubled life of Mikuláš Mušinka, his enthusiasm for science and research, which he carried out despite the bans and political restrictions. The paper records his stay in Kiev and his contacts with the representatives of the civic literary movement of so-called sexagenarians (I. Svitlyčnýj, I. Hončar, I. Dzjuba, L. Taňuk, V. Čornovol, B. Antonenko-Davydovyč, H. Kočur). It was due to the contacts with them why he was accused by the KGB of undermining the authority of the former Soviet Union. An important point is Mušinka´s activities at the Research facility of Ukrainian studies at P. J. Šafárik University in Prešov as well as his efforts to coordinate international Ukrainian studies research featuring fellow researchers from Western Europe, the USA, Canada and Ukraine. M. Mušinka has made a significant contribution to research on and promotion of the cultural heritage of the Ukrainians living in the Prešov region and Zakarpattia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".